There Will Be Spam: Characterizing State-Invariant Transactions and Speculative MEV
Vabuk Pahari, Johnnatan Messias, Christof Ferreira Torres
cs.CR
Submitted: 2026-07-27
Code: https://github.com/cdump/evmole
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Blockchains rely on transparency and immutability to ensure trust, but these guarantees come at the cost of an ever-growing ledger that increasingly threatens decentralization by making it more
Terminology
Abstract
Blockchains rely on transparency and immutability to ensure trust, but these guarantees come at the cost of an ever-growing ledger that increasingly threatens decentralization by making it more expensive to store and maintain the full transaction history. In this work, we introduce state-invariant transactions, defined as transactions whose inclusion or removal does not affect the resulting blockchain state beyond transaction fees. We argue that these transactions constitute a form of on-chain spam because they consume execution, bandwidth, storage, and blockspace without contributing to the final ledger state. We present the first large-scale measurement of state-invariant transactions across Ethereum, Optimism, and Base, identifying nearly 1.4 billion such transactions. While only 2.6% of Ethereum transactions are state-invariant, they account for 24% of transactions on Optimism and 37% on Base, representing a significant source of unnecessary resource consumption on Layer-2 blockchains. We show that speculative Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) is the dominant source of state-invariant transactions on Optimism and Base, accounting for 57% and 68%, respectively, but is not the only source as previously assumed. Moreover, despite its popularity, speculative MEV is not the most profitable strategy once the costs of state-invariant transactions are considered. Beyond MEV, we identify substantial malicious activity, with address poisoning campaigns accounting for 53% of non-reverted state-invariant transactions on Ethereum. Our findings suggest that mitigating state-invariant transactions could substantially reduce blockchain resource consumption and transaction costs while limiting phishing campaigns and other forms of blockchain abuse.
Sources
- When Priority Fails: Revert-Based MEV on Fast-Finality Rollups
- Ethereum Crypto Wallets under Address Poisoning: How Usable and Secure Are They?
- The Express Lane to Spam and Centralization: An Empirical Analysis of Arbitrum's Timeboost
- Unity is Strength: A Formalization of Cross-Domain Maximal Extractable Value
- Blockspace Under Pressure: An Analysis of Spam MEV on High-Throughput Blockchains
- To Wait or To Probe: Arbitrage Competition on High-Throughput Blockchains
Related papers
- SoK: AI-Augmented Binary Reversing
- Relaxed Sender Anonymity for CBDC Interbank Settlement: A Zero-Knowledge Approach on Permissioned EVM
- Calibration-Family Overfit: Why Trusted Sabotage Monitors Don't Transfer Across Lineages
- Efficient Fuzzy PSI under One-Sided Assumptions
- Sealing the Audit-Runtime Gap for LLM Skills
- Token Composition: A Graph Based on EVM Logs