Hierarchical Gaussian-process reconstruction of late-time expansion with DESI BAO and compressed Planck priors
astro-ph.CO
Submitted: 2026-07-26
Updated: 2026-09-19
Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: DESI DR2 BAO combined with CMB and Type Ia supernovae in the Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL) parameterisation prefers evolving dark energy over CDM at roughly 2.8 -- 4.2 sigma.
Terminology
Abstract
DESI DR2 BAO combined with CMB and Type Ia supernovae in the Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL) parameterisation prefers evolving dark energy over CDM at roughly 2.8 -- 4.2 sigma. We reconstruct the same late-time expansion history with a hierarchical Gaussian process (GP) that co-samples the kernel hyperparameters (sigma f,l) together with (H 0, m, k, omega b h 2), coupling BAO, compressed Planck distance priors, and Pantheon+ through a Monte-Carlo effective likelihood conditioned on 37 cosmic-chronometer H(z) points. The baseline posterior gives w(z 0)=-0.80+0.26-0.23 (68% C.L.), about 0.8 sigma from w=-1, with l=3.79+0.81-1.12. A CPL fit on the identical compressed Planck pipeline improves nested CDM by only chi 2 about 1 (about 1 sigma). Ablations that fix (sigma f,l), drop SN or LRG1/2 BAO, replace the radial-basis kernel by Mat'ern- 5/2, or tighten the prior on l leave the median w(0) within 1 sigma of-1. The mild preference reported here is therefore specific to this compressed-CMB analysis and does not address DESI's full Planck-likelihood result.
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation