QSTAR: Quantum Selective Transfer with Adaptive Routing

arXiv:2607.21411 · quant-ph, cs.LG · Submitted 2026-07-23 · Read on arXiv

quant-ph, cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-07-23

Updated: 2026-07-23

Code: https://github.com/sr7849-sudo/QSTAR

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Quantum transfer learning (QTL) is often evaluated by replacing a classical classifier with a fixed variational quantum head, but this hides a key question: when is the quantum branch actually

Terminology

Abstract

Quantum transfer learning (QTL) is often evaluated by replacing a classical classifier with a fixed variational quantum head, but this hides a key question: when is the quantum branch actually useful? We propose QSTAR: Quantum Selective Transfer with Adaptive Routing, a selective QTL framework that keeps high-confidence classical predictions and routes only low-confidence samples to a fallback branch. Using a frozen ResNet18 backbone on Fashion-MNIST, we compare manually designed QTL heads, KetGPT-designed quantum heads, and parameter-matched classical baselines under a common data split and optimization schedule. Standard QTL heads reach at most 57.0% accuracy, while the strongest KetGPT head in the main filtered sweep reaches 78.5% accuracy and 0.785 F1-score. Although the strongest fixed classical head remains higher at 81.6%, selective routing gives the quantum branch a clearer role. On low-confidence samples, KetGPT #180 improves accuracy over a parameter-matched MLP fallback by 6.82, 4.31, and 3.03 percentage points at thresholds of 0.70, 0.80, and 0.90. At the full-system level, Adaptive KetGPT-QTL reaches 80.9% accuracy and 0.807 F1-score, outperforming the adaptive classical baseline. A separate compact-circuit ablation identifies KetGPT #160 as a stronger fixed-head candidate, reaching 81.9% accuracy with only 10 quantum parameters and 9 gates. These results suggest that architecture-searched quantum heads are most useful as targeted fallback branches for uncertain inputs rather than uniform replacements for classical classifiers.

Sources

Related papers