Benchmarking wall velocities in cosmological phase transitions: Fluid Ansatz and WallGo
Gláuber C. Dorsch, Marek Lewicki, Daniel A. Pinto
astro-ph.CO, hep-ph
Submitted: 2026-07-20
Comments: 35 pages, 6 figures
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: A reliable computation of the bubble wall velocity during a cosmological phase transition requires an adequate modeling of the non-equilibrium dynamics in the vicinity of this expanding bubble.
Terminology
Abstract
A reliable computation of the bubble wall velocity during a cosmological phase transition requires an adequate modeling of the non-equilibrium dynamics in the vicinity of this expanding bubble. This task can be made computationally faster by imposing an Ansatz on the shape of the non-equilibrium particle distribution function, thus simplifying the collision terms and making the Boltzmann equation solvable in terms of some out-of-equilibrium fluctuations. Two different Ans"atze have prevailed in the recent literature: the so-called fluid Ansatz and an expansion in a basis of Chebyshev polynomials, consolidated in the public code WallGo. In this work we show that the two approaches yield essentially the same wall velocity in the regime of reasonably mild phase transitions, alpha 0.01. Interestingly, the agreement is excellent when only top-quark annihilation is considered, but a noticeable discrepancy appears once scattering processes are included. We also investigate the limitations of linearizing the Boltzmann equation when the fluid Ansatz is applied to stronger phase transitions, showing that non-linear contributions induce significant shifts in the predicted terminal velocity as alpha to 1, even though the non-linear contribution to the wall pressure remain quantitatively small compared to the equilibrium and linearized non-equilibrium parts. We discuss possible consequences of this result for both Ans"atze, while also highlighting the possible limitations of the WKB approach itself when applied to the regime of strong transitions. Since strong phase transitions are precisely the primary targets for future gravitational waves observatories, our study emphasizes that not only higher precision computations of v w in the semi-classical approach are required, but a treatment beyond the WKB approximation may be needed.
Sources
- Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
- GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs
- The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background
- Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves
- GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run
- GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run
- LISA and the LISA Science Team
- Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
- Electroweak baryogenesis
- Quantum Transport and Electroweak Baryogenesis
- Bubble-assisted Leptogenesis
- Dark Matter production from relativistic bubble walls
- Hot and heavy dark matter from a weak scale phase transition
- Hydrodynamic effects on the filtered dark matter produced by a first-order phase transition
- Bubble wall dynamics at the electroweak phase transition
- Collision Integrals for Cosmological Phase Transitions
- Non-linearities in cosmological bubble wall dynamics
- New calculation of collision integrals for cosmological phase transitions
- Bubble wall velocity with out-of-equilibrium corrections
- Electroweak baryogenesis at high wall velocities
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation