The VST ATLAS Survey IV: Galaxy, LRG and QSO bias and HODs via ACT CMB Lensing
Harshnoor Kaur, T. Shanks, S. Bose, A. C. Edge
CEA, Physics Dept., Durham University, UK · CEA, Physics Dept., Durham University, UK · ICC, Physics Dept., Durham University, UK · CEA, Physics Dept., Durham University, UK
astro-ph.CO
Submitted: 2026-07-16
Comments: 16 pages, 16 figures, submitted to MNRAS. Minus sign typos in Section 8 now fixed
Code: https://github.com/morriscb/chomp
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We present angular correlation and power spectral analyses of the clustering of VST ATLAS galaxies, LRGs and QSOs and their cross-correlations with the ACT DR6 CMB lensing map with its about3 times
Terminology
Abstract
We present angular correlation and power spectral analyses of the clustering of VST ATLAS galaxies, LRGs and QSOs and their cross-correlations with the ACT DR6 CMB lensing map with its about3 times higher resolution than Planck DR3. We first use CDM Halofit models at linear scales to estimate galaxy, LRG and QSO bias, b, from the ratio of the 3-D power spectra, b= P gg/P gK and hence the mass clustering amplitudes, sigma 8. For galaxies we find b G(z=0.15)=1.22 plus or minus0.07, sigma 8(z=0)=0.71 plus or minus0.06 and for LRGs b LRG(z=0.26)=2.76 plus or minus0.11, sigma 8(z=0)=0.63 plus or minus0.15, both consistent with CDM predictions. But for QSOs, we estimate a bias of b Q(z=1.7)=4.44 plus or minus0.24 and sigma 8(z=0)=0.49 plus or minus0.06, the latter significantly lower than expected for CDM and leads to an observed 0.15<z<1.7 gravitational growth rate faster than predicted for CDM. At smaller non-linear scales, HOD model fits imply a broad halo mass distribution for z about0.15 galaxies but much narrower mass distributions for LRGs and QSOs. More surprisingly, the HOD fit for QSOs implies M eff=5 times10 14M, about10 times higher than expected. Finally, while the LRG and QSO HOD models fit w gg and w gK consistently, the same is not true for the z about0.15 galaxies unless we hypothesise anti-bias with b G about0.55. This result supports previous QSO lensing analyses that also found anti-bias at r<5 h-1 Mpc. We suggest that while HOD + NFW halo models may well describe LRG mass profiles and clustering, at intermediate scales the dominant galaxy population (and QSOs) may follow the alternative hierarchical clustering model of Peebles(1974) where galaxies trace the mass more closely than in a halo model.
Sources
- The VST ATLAS Quasar Survey II: Halo mass profiles of galaxies, LRGs and galaxy clusters via quasar and CMB lensing
- The VST ATLAS Quasar Survey III: Halo mass function via quasar clustering and quasar-CMB lensing cross-clustering
- Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation