Signatures of Two Distinct Epochs of FRB 20240114A from January to August 2024 Based on its Energy and Waiting Time Analysis

arXiv:2607.01576 · astro-ph.HE · Submitted 2026-07-02 · Read on arXiv

Xiao Li, Ying Gu, En-Wei Liang

astro-ph.HE

Submitted: 2026-07-02

Comments: 12 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: A comprehensive analysis of the energy and waiting time distributions of the bursts from FRB 20240114A detected by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope between 28 January and 29

Terminology

Abstract

A comprehensive analysis of the energy and waiting time distributions of the bursts from FRB 20240114A detected by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope between 28 January and 29 August 2024 is presented. For the full sample, its energy distribution cannot be fitted with the simple power-law (SPL),bent power-law (BPL), thresholded power-law (TPL) or Band function models, and its waiting time distribution excluding intervals shorter than 0.5 s cannot be fitted with the Poisson or Weibull models. Nevertheless, for the subsamples with more than 50 bursts in single-day observations, their energy distributions can be fitted with the BPL or TPL models, and their waiting time distributions are better described by a Weibull model. It is noted that the best-fitting BPL parameter beta is approximately invariant within the epochs before and after 21 March 2024, with an average of beta b = 1.006 plus or minus 0.074 and beta a = 1.236 plus or minus 0.183 (one standard deviation), respectively. Most subsamples from the later epoch have a smaller burst rate parameter r in the Weibull model than those from the earlier epoch. The majority of bursts with E>10 39 erg occurred in the earlier epoch. The energy distributions in the high-energy range (> 6 times10 37 erg) differ significantly between the two epochs, and power-law fits to dN/dE yield indices of-1.97-0.02+0.02 and-2.34-0.06+0.06, respectively. The median of the waiting time distribution of the later epoch is larger than that in the earlier epoch. These results suggest that the two epochs may be dominated by different types of bursts, possibly attributed to changes in the physical properties of the emission region.

Sources

Related papers