Signatures of Two Distinct Epochs of FRB 20240114A from January to August 2024 Based on its Energy and Waiting Time Analysis
Xiao Li, Ying Gu, En-Wei Liang
astro-ph.HE
Submitted: 2026-07-02
Comments: 12 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: A comprehensive analysis of the energy and waiting time distributions of the bursts from FRB 20240114A detected by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope between 28 January and 29
Terminology
Abstract
A comprehensive analysis of the energy and waiting time distributions of the bursts from FRB 20240114A detected by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope between 28 January and 29 August 2024 is presented. For the full sample, its energy distribution cannot be fitted with the simple power-law (SPL),bent power-law (BPL), thresholded power-law (TPL) or Band function models, and its waiting time distribution excluding intervals shorter than 0.5 s cannot be fitted with the Poisson or Weibull models. Nevertheless, for the subsamples with more than 50 bursts in single-day observations, their energy distributions can be fitted with the BPL or TPL models, and their waiting time distributions are better described by a Weibull model. It is noted that the best-fitting BPL parameter beta is approximately invariant within the epochs before and after 21 March 2024, with an average of beta b = 1.006 plus or minus 0.074 and beta a = 1.236 plus or minus 0.183 (one standard deviation), respectively. Most subsamples from the later epoch have a smaller burst rate parameter r in the Weibull model than those from the earlier epoch. The majority of bursts with E>10 39 erg occurred in the earlier epoch. The energy distributions in the high-energy range (> 6 times10 37 erg) differ significantly between the two epochs, and power-law fits to dN/dE yield indices of-1.97-0.02+0.02 and-2.34-0.06+0.06, respectively. The median of the waiting time distribution of the later epoch is larger than that in the earlier epoch. These results suggest that the two epochs may be dominated by different types of bursts, possibly attributed to changes in the physical properties of the emission region.
Sources
- A Hyperactive FRB Pinpointed in an SMC-Like Satellite Host Galaxy
- Wideband Monitoring of FRB 20180916B Across a Half-Decade Bandwidth Using the Upgraded GMRT
- A broadband study of FRB20240114A with the Effelsberg 100-m radio telescope
- The CHIME/FRB Discovery of the Extremely Active Fast Radio Burst Source FRB 20240114A
- Decadal evolution of a repeating fast radio burst source
- Long-term simultaneous 2.25/8.60~GHz monitoring of the newly-discovered repeating FRB~20240114A
- The magnetar model's energy crisis for a prolific repeating fast radio burst source
- Investigating FRB 20240114A with FAST: Morphological Classification and Drifting Rate Measurements in a Burst-Cluster Framework
- A comprehensive search for Long and Short Periodic Features from an Extremely Active Cycle of FRB 20240114A
Related papers
- Numerical Studies of Accretion Flows onto a Neutron Star Engulfed in a Massive Star
- Collisionless Accretion of Finite-Angular-Momentum Plasma onto a Spinning Black Hole
- Impact of Magnetic Field Topology on Electromagnetic and Gravitational Waves from Binary Neutron Star Merger Remnants
- XRISM Resolve Spectroscopy of GX 5-1: Constraints on Iron Spectral Features in a Luminous Neutron-Star Binary
- SN 1006: A Cosmic Laboratory for Investigating Shock Acceleration Physics
- Neutrino Spectral Pinching in 3D Core-Collapse Supernovae: Late-Time Convergence, Failed-Explosion Signatures, and Viewing-Angle Dispersion