Parameter Golf: What Really Works?

arXiv:2607.01517 · cs.CL · Submitted 2026-07-01 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL

Submitted: 2026-07-01

Updated: 2026-09-05

Comments: Accepted at the BabyLM Workshop, EMNLP 2026

Code: https://github.com/PMP56/pmgolf-analysis

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: How far can a language model improve under a strict artifact budget? Parameter Golf posed this question as an open community challenge in which participants trained the best language model, with the

Terminology

Abstract

How far can a language model improve under a strict artifact budget? Parameter Golf posed this question as an open community challenge in which participants trained the best language model, with the complete artifact (training code + compressed weights) required to fit within 16 MB and to be trained in under ten minutes on 8xH100 SXM GPUs. Quality was measured in bits-per-byte (BPB), the average number of bits required to encode each byte of unseen text. We analyze 2,037 pull requests and 1,430 clean-scored submissions from the contest, build a taxonomy of 84 optimization techniques, and measure each technique's contribution to BPB. The verified leaderboard score dropped from 1.2244 to 1.058 BPB across three phases, a 13.6% reduction, despite individual techniques rarely improving BPB by more than 1%. We show that most techniques' gains shrink when re-measured among competitive submissions, isolating the few methods that help regardless of the surrounding stack. Code and data are available at https://github.com/PMP56/pmgolf-analysis.

Sources

Related papers