The Binary Tree Mechanism is Optimal for Differentially Private Continual Counting
cs.DS, cs.CR, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-07-01
Updated: 2026-09-18
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Private continual counting is a fundamental problem in differential privacy: given a binary stream of length n, where each 1 corresponds to the contribution of one individual, the goal is to release
Terminology
Abstract
Private continual counting is a fundamental problem in differential privacy: given a binary stream of length n, where each 1 corresponds to the contribution of one individual, the goal is to release all running counts while protecting the privacy of each individual. For fixed privacy parameters, the standard binary tree mechanism achieves expected infinity error O(3/2 n) under approximate differential privacy and O(squared n) under pure differential privacy. Whether these dependences on the stream length are necessary has remained a central open problem. For fixed epsilon in(0,1), we prove a lower bound of Ω(3/2 n) under approximate DP with sufficiently small fixed δ>0, and a lower bound of Ω(squared n) under pure DP. These bounds establish the optimality of the binary tree mechanism in both settings. The bounds hold for arbitrary mechanisms, even when the entire stream is available in advance. Both proofs use the same decomposition and accumulation of residual noise along a tree. As a consequence of the approximate-DP bound, we also obtain a largest-possible separation between hereditary discrepancy and private infinity error for linear queries, showing that the known general upper bound in terms of hereditary discrepancy has the optimal dependence on the number of queries.
Sources
Related papers
- Cascaded Learned Bloom Filter for Optimizing Model-Filter Size Balance and Fast Rejection
- Edge-Private Matching Kernels Through Local Decoding
- Local Node Differential Privacy
- Cheaper by the Batch: Shared Traversal for Genotype Graph Editing
- Scalable Algorithms for Approximate DNF Model Counting
- On the Approximation Relationship between Optimizing Ratio of Submodular (RS) and Difference of Submodular (DS) Functions