The age of the Universe from a large sample of the oldest Galactic stars
astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.SR
Submitted: 2026-07-01
Updated: 2026-10-08
Comments: 23 pages, 22 figures, 1 table. Submitted to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society in this form
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We estimate the age of the Universe using the Xiang & Rix sample of 247,103 Milky Way stars with high-resolution spectroscopy from LAMOST DR7 and Gaia eDR3 parallaxes.
Terminology
Abstract
We estimate the age of the Universe using the Xiang & Rix sample of 247,103 Milky Way stars with high-resolution spectroscopy from LAMOST DR7 and Gaia eDR3 parallaxes. Stellar ages were estimated using YY isochrones up to 20 Gyr. To remove stars with unusually high and precise ages, we require old stars to be metal-poor and alpha-enriched. We also require consistency between YY ages and those obtained with FLAME based only on Gaia data. Our final sample of 155,600 stars within 5 kpc provides consistent cosmic age estimates using several techniques of increasing rigour. Our main results use an MCMC reconstruction of the latent age distribution, though our iterative reconstruction is very similar. Applying an innovative approach to our MCMC reconstruction and its uncertainties, we find that the oldest star has an age of A = 13.73+0.18-0.15 Gyr. Varying the quality cuts can at most reduce this to A = 13.31+0.21-0.18 Gyr or raise it to 14.02+0.18-0.15 Gyr using a much lower or higher age-dependent metallicity ceiling, respectively. Our inferred A is consistent with the 13.6 Gyr expected in CMB-calibrated CDM, assuming the first long-lived stars formed when the Universe was 0.2 Gyr old. This agreement casts doubt on solutions to the Hubble tension solely through new physics prior to recombination, which generally imply a cosmic age of 12.9 plus or minus 0.2 Gyr to match low redshift probes. It is difficult for stellar modelling uncertainties to reconcile such a low age with our result given the low metallicities of the oldest stars in our sample and independent asteroseismic constraints.
Sources
- The LBT Y$_\mathrm{p}$ Project IV: A New Value of the Primordial Helium Abundance
- The local void model for the Hubble and BAO tensions
- A generic omega b tension in early-time solutions to the Hubble tension
- Constraining Fifth Forces using the Local Distance Ladder: Implications for the Hubble Tension
- A data-driven prediction for the primordial deuterium abundance
- How accurate are stellar ages based on stellar models ? I. The impact of stellar models uncertainties
- How accurate are stellar ages based on stellar models? II. The impact of asteroseismology
- Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers
- Dissecting the Hubble tension: Insights from a diverse set of Sound Horizon-free H0 measurements
- The Role of Type Ia Supernovae in Constraining the Hubble Constant
- The Age of the Universe with Globular Clusters IV: Multiple Stellar Populations
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation