Memoirs of the curvaton: non-perturbative non-Gaussianity and supermassive primordial black holes
S. Allegrini, A. J. Iovino, G. Perna, H. Veermäe
astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.HE, gr-qc
Submitted: 2026-06-26
Comments: 38 pages, 12 figures + Appendix
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: The curvaton provides a simple mechanism for generating strongly non-Gaussian curvature perturbations after inflation, with potentially important consequences on small scales.
Terminology
Abstract
The curvaton provides a simple mechanism for generating strongly non-Gaussian curvature perturbations after inflation, with potentially important consequences on small scales. We study curvaton dynamics beyond the standard quadratic potential and construct the local non-Gaussian map zeta=F(zeta G) relating the curvature perturbation to an auxiliary Gaussian field zeta G. Curvaton self-interactions make the onset of oscillations field dependent and modify the effective equation of state once the curvaton enters the adiabatic regime. We incorporate these effects using the abbreviated action, which provides a compact way to connect the frozen and oscillatory regimes and exposes sources of non-Gaussianity absent in the purely quadratic case. We apply the formalism to quadratic, monomial, quartic, and cosine potentials, for which we derive the mapping F(zeta G) and show that self-interactions can either enhance or suppress the resulting non-Gaussianity depending on the potential and initial conditions. We consider non-perturbative aspects in the strongly non-Gaussian regime, and show how strong non-Gaussianity can suppress the power spectrum. As an application, we provide a bottom-up scenario in which strongly positive curvaton non-Gaussianity allows primordial supermassive black hole seeds at peak amplitudes A pk about10-5, which are compatible with the COBE/FIRAS mu-distortion bounds. This opens a new primordial scenario for the Little Red Dots observed by the JWST. The axion-like curvaton provides a particularly natural setting for this mechanism.
Sources
- Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation
- Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
- Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity
- Matter power spectrum: from Ly$\alpha$ forest to CMB scales
- Disentangling the primordial nature of stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds with CMB spectral distortions
- DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
- Probing the inflaton: Small-scale power spectrum constraints from measurements of the CMB energy spectrum
- CMB spectral distortions from small-scale isocurvature fluctuations
- Scalar induced gravitational waves review
- Constraints on primordial curvature power spectrum with pulsar timing arrays
- Curbing PBHs with PTAs
- Gravitational waves induced by scalar perturbations as probes of the small-scale primordial spectrum
- Steepest growth of the power spectrum and primordial black holes
- Anatomy of single-field inflationary models for primordial black holes
- Primordial black hole formation during the QCD phase transition: threshold, mass distribution and abundance
- Induced gravitational waves in a general cosmological background
- Primordial black holes in non-Gaussian regimes
- Primordial black hole constraints for curvaton models with predicted large non-Gaussianity
- Calculating the mass spectrum of primordial black holes
- Stochastic gravitational waves associated with the formation of primordial black holes
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation