Forward-modelling the Tolman and distance-duality tests with IllustrisTNG

arXiv:2606.27182 · astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.GA · Submitted 2026-06-25 · Read on arXiv

Harry Desmond, Tariq Yasin, Richard Stiskalek, Sebastian von Hausegger

astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.GA

Submitted: 2026-06-25

Comments: 12 pages, 6 figures; to be submitted to MNRAS

Code: https://github.com/harrydesmond/Tolman_TNG

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: The Tolman surface-brightness test and the angular-size distance-duality test are two complementary probes of the same underlying relation between luminosity and angular-diameter distance, D L =

Terminology

Abstract

The Tolman surface-brightness test and the angular-size distance-duality test are two complementary probes of the same underlying relation between luminosity and angular-diameter distance, D L = (1+z) squared D A, as holds in any metric theory of gravity where photon number is conserved. Both tests have recently delivered a priori surprising signals: JWST/ASTRODEEP measurements yield a surface brightness scaling with redshift much flatter than the expected value, and ultracompact radio sources also appear to follow a flatter D L/D A scaling with redshift. These results have been suggested to support non-expanding cosmologies, however they are also sensitive to astrophysical and instrumental effects. We test whether these results indicate genuine departures from standard cosmology by forward-modelling observed surface-brightness evolution in the IllustrisTNG cosmological hydrodynamical simulation, with an empirical mock-spectroscopic selection trained on ASTRODEEP. We show that the astrophysical evolution relevant for both tests may be effectively parametrised as a single power-law exponent for the luminosity density as a function of redshift, for which the simulation gives gamma=2.23 plus or minus0.20 across realistic aperture conventions. This value is approximately sufficient to explain both the Tolman and distance-duality signals within standard cosmology and galaxy formation physics, with a small discrepancy for the latter suggesting that radio AGN evolve slightly more strongly than bright galaxies.

Sources

Related papers