Explicit Interaction Architectures for Dynamical Learning: A Controlled Study of Structural Inductive Bias
eess.SP, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-06-17
Updated: 2026-09-03
Comments: 15 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables. Substantially revised version. Expanded related work and positioning; controlled ESN comparisons under matched state dimension and equal calibration budget; additional NARMA10 experiments; regularization-sensitivity analysis; new bounded-state result and computational-scaling characterization. Conclusions revised to reflect the controlled evidence
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We investigate a structure-first approach to dynamical learning in which the organization of stateful interactions is prescribed explicitly rather than left entirely to a generic recurrent
Terminology
Abstract
We investigate a structure-first approach to dynamical learning in which the organization of stateful interactions is prescribed explicitly rather than left entirely to a generic recurrent parameterization. We introduce causal recurrent units built from an ordered sequence of local, state-modulated transformations. The construction is motivated by wave-based interaction models, but the units studied here do not impose scattering, passivity, or energy-balance constraints. Because fixed recurrent dynamics, designed reservoir topologies, readout-only learning, and recurrent depth are already well established, the empirical question is deliberately narrower: does the proposed interaction organization provide a useful inductive bias under controlled computational conditions? We compare a one-layer structured model, a two-layer structured model, and a generic echo-state network (ESN), all with 12 recurrent states and the same strictly linear ridge readout. Each model family receives the same random-search budget on calibration data that are disjoint from the final test data, after which the selected hyperparameters are frozen. On a custom nonlinear identification task, the one-layer structured model attains a mean validation NMSE of 2.76 x 10-4, compared with 3.19 x 10-4 for the two-layer model and 3.94 x 10-4 for the ESN. On NARMA10 the ordering reverses: the ESN attains 0.312, compared with 0.348 and 0.357 for the one- and two-layer structured models. Thus, the proposed organization can be competitive and advantageous on one task, but it is not universally superior; moreover, recurrent depth does not provide a systematic benefit under matched state dimension. The results support a task-dependent interpretation of structural inductive bias and position the present architecture as a controlled precursor to stronger wave- and system-theoretic constructions.
Sources
Related papers
- Runtime Assurance Under Measurement Attack: Necessary and Sufficient Observability Conditions for Learned Control in Radio Access Networks
- Physics-Constrained Deep Learning Model for Contactless Blood Pressure Monitoring from Triaxial Bodyseismography
- Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Biosignal Applications -- A Review
- Continuous Orthogonal Mode Decomposition: Haptic Signal Prediction in Tactile Internet
- Generative Models for Modeling and Synthesizing MIMO Channels in Adverse Weather Conditions
- Deep-Learning-Based Pixelated Microwave Filter Design and Characterization using Electro-Optical Electric-Field Measurements