Building three-dimensional giant stellar models for common envelope simulations
Technion, Israel · Technion, Israel · Technion, Israel
astro-ph.SR
Submitted: 2026-06-10
Updated: 2026-09-20
Comments: It will be submitted in two days to allow for comments (including missing references)
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We build a three-dimensional (3D) red supergiant (RSG) stellar model for common envelope evolution (CEE) simulations by transporting a 1D stellar model to a 3D numerical grid, mimicking core nuclear
Terminology
Abstract
We build a three-dimensional (3D) red supergiant (RSG) stellar model for common envelope evolution (CEE) simulations by transporting a 1D stellar model to a 3D numerical grid, mimicking core nuclear power by depositing energy to an inner shell, and mimicking stellar emission by cooling grid cells with densities below the photospheric density. We do not relax the model; rather, we let it perform its natural pulsation. We find that when we mimic photospheric emission by cooling low-density grid cells, the oscillations slowly decay on a time scale much longer than in the absence of photospheric cooling. When we mimic both nuclear energy production, by depositing the stellar luminosity in an inner shell above the inert core of the stellar model, and the photospheric cooling, the oscillations do not decay and their amplitude slowly increases with time. The main pulsational period is about 1 year, comparable to the stellar dynamical time, suggesting a fundamental radial pulsation mode. The non-spherical structure of the stellar model and rapid low-amplitude temporal variations in the average stellar radius testify to the presence of non-radial oscillation modes on top of the fundamental radial mode. We also obtain vigorous convection, as RSG stars have. We conclude that the best way of preparing a giant star to simulate CEE and grazing-envelope evolution is to deposit energy with the stellar luminosity in an inner shell, and to cool the outer low-density numerical shell. There is no need to relax the model.
Sources
- Understanding the Drag Torque in Common Envelope Evolution
- Post-common-envelope planetary nebulae
- The Effect of Donor Star Rejuvenation on Common Envelope Evolution
- Successful Common Envelope Ejection and Binary Neutron Star Formation in 3D Hydrodynamics
- A Path to Constraints on Common Envelope Ejection in Massive Binaries: Full Evolutionary Reconstruction of Three Black Hole X-ray Binaries
- The Evolution of Binaries Embedded Within Common Envelopes
- High-Speed Outflows and Dusty Disks during the AGB to PN Transition: The PANORAMA survey
- From spherical stars to disk-like structures: 3D common-envelope evolution of massive binaries beyond inspiral
- Magnetically driven outflows in 3D common-envelope evolution of massive stars
Related papers
- HXI-DLA2: A Physics-Constrained Deep Learning Algorithm for the ASO-S Hard X-ray Imager
- Effect of Neutron Star Jets on Common Envelope Evolution
- Constraining the origin of magnetic white dwarfs
- JW-FD: A 15-Year Multimodal Dataset for Solar Flare Forecasting
- Phlegethon: a fully compressible magnetohydrodynamic code for simulations in stellar astrophysics
- Can MHD Oscillations Modulate Quasi-Periodic Plasma Release from Coronal Streamers?