EmoTrack: Clinical-Semantic Modeling for Text-Based Depression Severity Estimation

arXiv:2605.22286 · cs.LG, cs.AI · Submitted 2026-05-21 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-05-21

Updated: 2026-09-08

Comments: Compared with v1, this version (V2) focuses on the EmoTrack method. The LongCounsel-8 dataset contribution is presented separately in arXiv:2609.03507

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Text-based counseling provides a valuable source of information for assessing depression severity.

Terminology

Abstract

Text-based counseling provides a valuable source of information for assessing depression severity. We study prediction of the total score on the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), a self-report measure of depression severity, from counseling transcripts. Clinical-based methods rely mainly on large language model (LLM) inference to obtain structured session-level assessments, but these assessments provide limited information about which utterances support each score. Training-based methods train predictors directly on sentences or their semantic embeddings and preserve local conversational detail, but must learn clinical structure from limited labeled transcripts. Integrating a small set of clinical feature scores with a long sequence of high-dimensional utterance representations is challenging, as simple fusion can overemphasize dialogue evidence and fail to link clinical features to supporting utterances. Combining structured clinical assessments with sentence-level semantics, we propose EmoTrack, which jointly encodes clinical feature scores and utterance representations to predict the total PHQ-8 score. For longitudinal assessment across successive sessions, the model can also incorporate a compressed representation of the preceding session as optional memory. On the real-world DAIC-WOZ benchmark, EmoTrack reduces mean absolute error from 2.8234 to 2.4708 relative to the strongest evaluated baseline. Across five settings covering single-session estimation, cross-dataset transfer without adaptation, and longitudinal assessment, it reduces normalized aggregate error by approximately 6.1% relative to the strongest baseline.

Sources

Related papers