Mare versus highland lunar impact flash light curve dichotomy
D. Athanasopoulos, A. Liakos, A. Z. Bonanos, D. Koschny, O. Sykioti, M. Devogèle, J. L. Cano, R. Moissl
astro-ph.EP
Submitted: 2026-05-19
Comments: 9 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables; accepted to A&A Letters
Journal ref: A&A 710, L29 (2026)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202660978
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We perform a comprehensive analysis of lunar impact flash (LIF) light curve shapes and their dependence on the lunar terrain, using the large sample of LIFs detected by NELIOTA over the last 9 years.
Terminology
Abstract
We perform a comprehensive analysis of lunar impact flash (LIF) light curve shapes and their dependence on the lunar terrain, using the large sample of LIFs detected by NELIOTA over the last 9 years. We classified 124 multi-frame light curves into mare, highland and `border' regions. Subsequently, we derived analytical expressions for single-size and dual-size ejecta cooling models, which were fitted to the observational data to estimate their physical properties. While impacts on both terrains yield similar peak magnitude distributions, their decay behaviour differs significantly; highland LIFs exhibit a shallower and longer-lasting decay compared to mare flashes, which are faster and steeper. The dual-size model suggests this extended duration is primarily driven by the fine droplets of the ejecta. The profile and duration of the LIF light curves represent the initial stages of the impact cratering process. The observed dichotomy between highland and mare LIFs demonstrates that the initial stages of the impact cratering process are fundamentally dependent on lunar lithology.
Related papers
- PDS 70 c and SR 12 c: Observational Constraints on Giant-Planet and Satellite Formation
- Two-stage disruption of resonant chains
- Detectability of resolved hydrogen lines from the accretion shock at gas giants and their CPDs
- Binary-lens Microlensing Degeneracy: Impact on Planetary Sensitivity and Mass-ratio Function
- Atmospheric escape fractionates secondary but not primary atmospheres
- The Occurrence Rate of Nearby Planetary Companions to Hot Jupiters