Multimodal Ambivalence/Hesitancy Recognition in Videos for Personalized Digital Health Interventions

arXiv:2604.11730 · cs.CV, cs.HC, cs.LG · Submitted 2026-04-13 · Read on arXiv

Listen

Radio episode about this paper

Transcript

Introduction to the show: ident: AI Radio. Generated commentary on the latest Artificial Intelligence papers.

Tom: Today's paper: "Multimodal Ambivalence/Hesitancy Recognition in Videos for Personalized Digital Health Interventions".

Jane: Using behavioral science, health interventions focus on behavior change by providing a framework to help patients acquire and maintain healthy habits that improve medical outcomes.

Tom: First, who's behind it and why it matters.

Title and authors: Tom: Now, let’s talk about the people behind this study. The authors are Manuela González-González, Soufiane Belharbi, Muhammad Osama Zeeshan, Masoumeh Sharafi, Muhammad Haseeb Aslam, Lorenzo Sia, Nicolas Richet, Marco Pedersoli, Alessandro Lameiras Koerich, Simon L Bacon and Eric Granger. These folks are clearly experts in their respective fields.

Jane: It’s interesting to see a team with such diverse backgrounds working on this topic; you have computer science expertise mixed with clinical knowledge, which is really important when dealing with health behaviors.

Lu: Their combined experience across different modalities and learning setups suggests they approached the problem from several angles, which should give us a very well-rounded view of the technical challenges involved in this paper.

Meng: I’m curious how their specific expertise influenced the choice between supervised learning, domain adaptation, and zero-shot inference for tackling this kind of complex recognition task.

Lalam: It shows that when dealing with something as subtle as A/H, a multi-faceted approach involving different AI techniques is necessary to really capture the complexity.

The paper's summary: Tom: So, what does the core of this paper actually say? Essentially, they are looking at how to use deep learning models on video data to recognize this ambivalence or hesitancy state. They’re using a dataset with videos from three hundred participants answering seven questions across visual, audio, and text modalities.

Jane: That means they are not just looking at one thing; they’re trying to pull information from how someone looks, how they sound, and what they say to get a complete picture of that hesitation.

Lu: The paper explains that A/H is like a compound emotion, where basic emotions might clash in real-world scenarios, making them difficult for standard models to catch accurately.

Meng: So the main finding here seems to be that combining these modalities helps, but they also found that simple fusion techniques aren't always the best way to put all those pieces together smoothly.

Lalam: The paper highlights how different learning setups perform differently, which suggests that there isn't one single perfect method for identifying A/H across all contexts.

The paper's improvements: Tom: One of the key areas they focus on is showing how to make these systems better through specific methodological tweaks. They explored supervised learning, unsupervised domain adaptation for personalization, and zero-shot inference using large language models like MLLMs.

Jane: Their suggestion about improving the system involves using subject-aware alignment in domain adaptation, which is a clever way to tailor the recognition model specifically to an individual user's style or context.

Lu: The paper pointed out that zero-shot inference with MLLMs could be very powerful because it shows that providing both the transcript and a definition of ambivalence in the prompt significantly boosts frame-level prediction accuracy.

Meng: From an engineering standpoint, this points toward using LLMs not just for generating text, but as a critical component in interpreting visual cues when we don't have specific training data for every single emotional nuance.

Lalam: The paper really suggests that the future of this isn't just about one model type; it’s about building a layered system where different parts handle different aspects of the recognition task.

Conclusion: Tom: So, to wrap up, we’re seeing that multimodal approaches are necessary for recognizing A/H in videos because they capture the complexity better than single-modality methods alone. They also found that techniques like subject-aware alignment and using LLMs with contextual prompts offer ways to push performance forward.

Jane: The big implication is that we can move toward digital health interventions that feel much more natural and responsive because they can actually read the subtle hesitation in a person's behavior across different channels.

Lu: It really opens up possibilities for creating deeply personalized feedback loops where the AI understands not just what someone is doing, but what they might be feeling internally regarding their health journey.

Meng: For practical application, this means we can design interventions that adjust their tone or message in real-time based on detected A/H, making the digital support much more meaningful to use.

Lalam: Ultimately, the paper on Multimodal Ambivalence/Hesitancy Recognition in Videos for Personalized Digital Health Interventions gives us a roadmap for building AI that understands human emotional complexity, which is a massive step for personalized well-being.

Manuela González-González, Soufiane Belharbi, Muhammad Osama Zeeshan, Masoumeh Sharafi, Muhammad Haseeb Aslam, Lorenzo Sia, Nicolas Richet, Marco Pedersoli

LIVIA, Department of Systems Engineering, ETS Montreal, Canada · LIVIA, Department of Software and IT Engineering, ETS Montreal, Canada · Department of Health, Kinesiology & Applied Physiology, Concordia University · Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre

cs.CV, cs.HC, cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-04-13

Updated: 2026-10-02

Comments: 11 pages, 4 figures, ACII 2026. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2505.19328

Code: https://github.com/sbelharbi/ah-digital-health-interventions

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Importance score: 74/100

The gist: Using behavioral science, health interventions focus on behavior change by providing a framework to help patients acquire and maintain healthy habits that improve medical outcomes.

Key concepts

Ambivalence and Hesitancy (A/H)
A/H refers to subtle, conflicting emotions where a person is caught between positive and negative feelings about a health action. It shows hesitation or conflict, which can lead to delaying or avoiding interventions.
Modality Pre-processing
This involves extracting specific features from different data types: visual frames (using models like ResNet), audio (using Log Melspectrograms), and text transcripts (using BERT). This step prepares each type of information for the AI model to understand.
Domain Adaptation
This technique is used to personalize recognition by treating each participant's data as its own unique domain. The best method found combines pseudo-labeling with subject-aware alignment, which helps the model learn specific patterns for that individual.

Terminology

Summary

Using behavioral science, health interventions focus on behavior change by providing a framework to help patients acquire and maintain healthy habits that improve medical outcomes.

The gist: Existing models show limited performance for A/H recognition, suggesting that more adapted multi-modal models are required for accurate A/H recognition.

Problem Statement

Ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) play a primary role for individuals delaying, avoiding, or abandoning health interventions. These are described as subtle and conflicting emotions that place a person in a state between positive and negative evaluations of a behaviour, or between acceptance and refusal to engage in it. A/H manifests as affective inconsistency across modalities or within a modality, such as language, facial, vocal expressions, and body language. While experts can be trained to recognize A/H in person, integrating them into digital health interventions is costly and less effective, making automatic recognition critical for personalization.

Methodological Framework

The study explores the application of deep learning models for A/H recognition in videos using three distinct learning setups:

  1. Supervised learning.

  2. Unsupervised domain adaptation for personalization.

  3. Zero-shot inference via large language models (LLMs).

The experiments are conducted on the unique and recently published BAH video dataset, which is composed of videos from 300 participants answering seven questions, providing three modalities: visual, audio, and transcript (text), annotated at frame- and video-level. The dataset contains a total of 1,427 videos and 10.60 hours of recording.

Modality Pre-processing

The pre-processing involves extracting features for each modality:

(Visual)

Frames are extracted at 24 fps, faces are cropped and aligned using the RetinaFace model, resized to 256x256 RGB images. Visual backbones explored include ResNet architectures (ResNet18, 34, 50, 101, and 152) and ViT-based models.

(Audio)

Videos are converted to mono audio channels at a 16 kHz sampling rate in WAV format. Log Melspectrogram features are extracted using the VGGish model.

(Text)

Audio transcripts are generated using the Whisper model, and word-level features are extracted using the BERT Base Uncased model. A word-level feature is repeated per its timestamp for all corresponding frames to synchronize with other modalities.

Learning Scenarios and Findings

The paper investigates performance across different learning scenarios:

(Supervised Learning)

Models are trained on a basic emotion recognition task (e.g., 'happy', 'sad') using large mixed datasets before being fine-tuned on the BAH train set for A/H recognition, with under-sampling of the negative class to account for class imbalance. Frame-level classification performance shows that context modeling improves results, as temporal dependency between frames is leveraged using a Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN).

(Multimodal Baselines)

When combining modalities, text modality alone yields better performance than visual or audio modalities for frame-level classification. The impact of feature fusion techniques is examined, showing that LFAN and CAN fusion lead over both metrics. Combining all three modalities slightly reduces performance in terms of AP, suggesting the need for more adapted fusion techniques.

(Video-level Classification)

Experiments using Video-FocalNet show that a specialized model yields better performance on average over both metrics compared to models trained on basic emotion understanding. The Video-FocalNet base-case yields an AP of 0.6732 and AVGF1 of 0.5663, leading the board.

(Personalization using Domain Adaptation)

Domain adaptation is explored where each participant in the test set is considered an independent target domain for frame-level classification. The results indicate that ACPL [110] achieves the best performance, with an AVGF1 of 0.5417 and an AP of 0.3739, highlighting the benefit of combining pseudo-labeling with subject-aware alignment over methods like MMD or SHOT.

(Zero-shot Inference using MLLMs)

Zero-shot inference using Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) is tested by varying the query prompt. The best results for frame-level prediction are obtained using the Transcript + Def 1 prompt, where the actual transcript of the video is also provided, suggesting that the textual modality serves a significant role in the identification of the A/H. The performance is substantially influenced by the query prompt, with adding both definition and transcript improving results.

Recommendations for Future Work

The paper recommends a two-level framework for more interpretable A/H recognition systems:

  1. Modeling affect per modality independently (e.g.

Improvements for AI systems

Here are specific improvements to existing AI systems derived from the findings in this paper, along with what those improved systems can achieve:


  1. Improve Video-Based Ambivalence/Hesitancy (A/H) Recognition Systems by Implementing a Dedicated Conflict Detection Module.

  2. Enhance Personalization Capabilities Using Subject-Based Domain Adaptation and Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) Strategies for Digital Health Interventions.

  3. Develop Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) for Zero-Shot A/H Inference by Optimizing Prompt Engineering with Transcript Integration.

  4. Implement a Two-Level Framework for A/H Recognition: Modality-Specific Modeling followed by a Dedicated Cross-Modal Conflict Assessment Module.

  5. The improved system can move beyond simple positive/negative emotion classification to explicitly detect the state where an individual exhibits contradictory cues (e.g., smiling while speaking with a tone indicating reluctance, or a positive facial expression paired with negative body language). This allows for the detection of subtle, high-risk emotional states that standard models miss.

  6. By integrating Subject-Based Domain Adaptation (like ACPL) and Test-Time Adaptation (TTA), the AI system can adapt its recognition model in real-time or per user session using minimal, personalized data. This enables a digital health intervention to instantly adjust its support strategy—for example, shifting from encouraging physical activity cues to offering motivational dialogue—based on the user's momentary hesitation captured in their video feed.

  7. The enhanced MLLM system can perform accurate A/H recognition even when only given a text transcript and a definition of ambivalence (Zero-Shot Inference). This allows for rapid prototyping of new digital health features without requiring massive, task-specific labeled datasets for every new emotional nuance. Furthermore, by using the transcript in the prompt, the model can leverage linguistic context to better disambiguate visual cues related to A/H.

  8. The proposed Two-Level Framework will allow researchers to separate affect per modality (e.g., classifying facial expression as 'happy' or 'sad') from cross-modal conflict assessment. This modularity allows for interpretable decision-making; the system can first identify a conflict between the audio tone and the visual expression, confirming that A/H is present, leading to more robust and explainable digital health interventions.

Abstract

Using behavioural science, health interventions focus on behaviour change by providing a framework to help patients acquire and maintain healthy habits that improve medical outcomes. In-person interventions are costly and difficult to scale, especially in resource-limited regions. Digital health interventions offer a cost-effective approach, potentially supporting independent living and self-management. Automating such interventions, especially through machine learning, has recently gained considerable attention. Ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) play a primary role for individuals to delay, avoid, or abandon health interventions. A/H are subtle and conflicting emotions that place a person in a state between positive and negative evaluations of a behaviour, or between acceptance and refusal to engage in it. They manifest as affective inconsistency across modalities or within a modality, such as language, facial, vocal expressions, and body language. While experts can be trained to recognize A/H, integrating them into digital health interventions is costly and less effective. Automatic A/H recognition is therefore critical for the personalization and cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions. Here, we explore the application of deep learning models for A/H recognition in videos, a multi-modal task by nature. In particular, this paper covers three learning setups: supervised learning, unsupervised domain adaptation for personalization, and zero-shot inference via large language models (LLMs). Our experiments are conducted on the unique and recently published BAH video dataset for A/H recognition. Our results show limited performance, suggesting that more adapted multi-modal models are required for accurate A/H recognition. Better methods for modeling spatio-temporal and multimodal fusion are necessary to leverage conflicts within/across modalities.

Sources

Related papers