Phantom-Crossing Dark Energy and the m Tug-of-War

arXiv:2603.22406 · astro-ph.CO, gr-qc · Submitted 2026-03-23 · Read on arXiv

astro-ph.CO, gr-qc

Submitted: 2026-03-23

Updated: 2026-09-05

Comments: 21 pages, 7 figures

Journal ref: JCAP09(2026)023

DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/09/023

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

The gist: Recent analyses combining data from the cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and Type Ia supernovae (SN) have revealed a tentative observational preference for

Terminology

Abstract

Recent analyses combining data from the cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and Type Ia supernovae (SN) have revealed a tentative observational preference for phantom crossing in the dark energy equation of state w. We argue that this preference is a natural consequence of the Ω m tensions that arise when these datasets are individually fit to Λ CDM, specifically because of the ordering Ω m BAO < Ω m CMB < Ω m SN. We show both theoretically and empirically that models with phantom crossing can shift all of these inferred Ω m values toward mutual alignment. In contrast, quintessence theories restricted to w at least-1 can alleviate the tensions with SN data but only at the cost of exacerbating the BAO-CMB discrepancy. We therefore conclude that it is the BAO and CMB measurements - not the SN data - that drive the preference for phantom crossing over quintessence in joint analyses. Moreover, we point out that SN data exhibit greater tensions with the other datasets when fit to phantom-crossing models than when fit to quintessence, causing the preference for phantom crossing to be weaker in joint CMB+BAO+SN analyses than in analyses of CMB+BAO data alone.

Sources

Related papers