Phantom-Crossing Dark Energy and the m Tug-of-War
astro-ph.CO, gr-qc
Submitted: 2026-03-23
Updated: 2026-09-05
Comments: 21 pages, 7 figures
Journal ref: JCAP09(2026)023
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/09/023
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The gist: Recent analyses combining data from the cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and Type Ia supernovae (SN) have revealed a tentative observational preference for
Terminology
Abstract
Recent analyses combining data from the cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and Type Ia supernovae (SN) have revealed a tentative observational preference for phantom crossing in the dark energy equation of state w. We argue that this preference is a natural consequence of the Ω m tensions that arise when these datasets are individually fit to Λ CDM, specifically because of the ordering Ω m BAO < Ω m CMB < Ω m SN. We show both theoretically and empirically that models with phantom crossing can shift all of these inferred Ω m values toward mutual alignment. In contrast, quintessence theories restricted to w at least-1 can alleviate the tensions with SN data but only at the cost of exacerbating the BAO-CMB discrepancy. We therefore conclude that it is the BAO and CMB measurements - not the SN data - that drive the preference for phantom crossing over quintessence in joint analyses. Moreover, we point out that SN data exhibit greater tensions with the other datasets when fit to phantom-crossing models than when fit to quintessence, causing the preference for phantom crossing to be weaker in joint CMB+BAO+SN analyses than in analyses of CMB+BAO data alone.
Sources
- The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration
- DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints
- Persistent and serious challenge to the $\Lambda$CDM throne: Evidence for dynamical dark energy rising from combinations of different types of datasets
- Dark Energy Crosses the Line: Quantifying and Testing the Evidence for Phantom Crossing
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Maps
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters
- Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry
- DESI DR2 Results I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest
- Validation of the DESI DR2 Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Galaxies and Quasars
- Validation of the DESI DR2 Ly$\alpha$ BAO analysis using synthetic datasets
- Construction of the Damped Ly$\alpha$ Absorber Catalog for DESI DR2 Ly$\alpha$ BAO
- Taking Bigger Metropolis Steps by Dragging Fast Variables
- GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples
- Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models
- CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology
- Thawing Quintessence: Priors, evidence, and likely trajectories
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models
- The Mirage of w=-1
- Dynamical Dark Energy Meets Varying Electron Mass: Implications for Phantom Crossing and the Hubble Constant
- The Serendipitous Axiodilaton: A Self-Consistent Recombination-Era Solution to the Hubble Tension
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation