Guideline-grounded retrieval-augmented generation for ophthalmic clinical decision support

arXiv:2603.21925 · cs.AI · Submitted 2026-03-23 · Read on arXiv

cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-03-23

Updated: 2026-09-17

Comments: 13 pages, 2 figures, 6 tables, Best Oral in ICAIAgent 2026

Journal ref: ICAIAgent '26: Proceedings of the 2026 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Agents

DOI: 10.1145/3811238.3811871

Code: https://github.com/Suey419/Oph-Guid-RAG

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: In this work, we propose Oph-Guid-RAG, a multimodal visual RAG system for ophthalmology clinical question answering and decision support.

Terminology

Abstract

In this work, we propose Oph-Guid-RAG, a multimodal visual RAG system for ophthalmology clinical question answering and decision support. We treat each guideline page as an independent evidence unit and directly retrieve page images, preserving tables, flowcharts, and layout information. We further design a controllable retrieval framework with routing and filtering, which selectively introduces external evidence and reduces noise. The system integrates query decomposition, query rewriting, retrieval, reranking, and multimodal reasoning, and provides traceable outputs with guideline page references. We evaluate our method on HealthBench using a doctor-based scoring protocol. On the hard subset, our approach improves the overall score from 0.2969 to 0.3861 (+0.0892, +30.0%) compared to GPT-5.2, and achieves higher accuracy, improving from 0.5956 to 0.6576 (+0.0620, +10.4%). Compared to GPT-5.4, our method achieves a larger accuracy gain of +0.1289 (+24.4%). These results show that our method is more effective on challenging cases that require precise, evidence-based reasoning. Ablation studies further show that reranking, routing, and retrieval design are critical for stable performance, especially under difficult settings. Overall, we show how combining visionbased retrieval with controllable reasoning can improve evidence grounding and robustness in clinical AI applications,while pointing out that further work is needed to be more complete.

Sources

Related papers