From Noise to Signal: When Outliers Seed New Topics
cs.CL, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-03-18
Updated: 2026-09-19
Comments: To appear in the Proceedings of the 15th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2026)
Code: https://github.com/ranahaani/GNews
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The gist: Outliers in dynamic topic modeling are typically treated as noise, yet we show that some can serve as early signals of emerging topics.
Terminology
Abstract
Outliers in dynamic topic modeling are typically treated as noise, yet we show that some can serve as early signals of emerging topics. We introduce a temporal taxonomy of news-document trajectories that defines how documents relate to topic formation over time. It distinguishes anticipatory outliers, which precede the topics they later join, from documents that either reinforce existing topics or remain isolated. By capturing these trajectories, the taxonomy links weak-signal detection with temporal topic modeling and clarifies how individual articles anticipate, initiate, or drift within evolving clusters. We implement it in a cumulative clustering setting using document embeddings from eleven state-of-the-art language models and evaluate it retrospectively on HydroNewsFr, a French news corpus on the hydrogen economy. Inter-model agreement reveals a small, high-consensus subset of anticipatory outliers, increasing confidence in these labels. Qualitative case studies further illustrate these trajectories through concrete topic developments.
Sources
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering