Scaling Laws of SignSGD in Linear Regression: When Does It Outperform SGD?

arXiv:2603.02069 · cs.LG, cs.AI, math.OC, stat.ML · Submitted 2026-03-02 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, cs.AI, math.OC, stat.ML

Submitted: 2026-03-02

Updated: 2026-09-20

Comments: Accepted at ICLR 2026, 89 pages, 25 figures

Code: https://github.com/shehper/scaling_laws

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: We study scaling laws of signSGD under a power-law random features (PLRF) model that accounts for both feature and target decay.

Terminology

Abstract

We study scaling laws of signSGD under a power-law random features (PLRF) model that accounts for both feature and target decay. We analyze the population risk of a linear model trained with one-pass signSGD on Gaussian-sketched features. We express the risk as a function of model size, training steps, learning rate, and the feature and target decay parameters. Comparing against the SGD risk analyzed by Paquette et al. (2024), we identify a drift-normalization effect and a noise-reshaping effect unique to signSGD. We then obtain compute-optimal scaling laws under the optimal choice of learning rate. Our analysis shows that the noise-reshaping effect can make the compute-optimal slope of signSGD steeper than that of SGD in regimes where noise is dominant. Finally, we observe that the widely used warmup-stable-decay (WSD) schedule further reduces the noise term and sharpens the compute-optimal slope, when feature decay is fast but target decay is slow.

Sources

Related papers