Parity, Sensitivity, and Transformers
cs.LG, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-02-05
Updated: 2026-09-05
Comments: 15 pages. Version 2 -- lower bound extended from 1-layer 1-head to 1-layer O(1)-head transformers. Version 3 -- minor corrections
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Understanding what neural architectures can and cannot compute is a central challenge in the theory of AI.
Terminology
Abstract
Understanding what neural architectures can and cannot compute is a central challenge in the theory of AI. One of the fundamental problems in this context is the PARITY task, which asks whether the number of 1s in a binary input sequence is even or odd. PARITY is one of the central tasks studied in the theory of computation, yet it remains surprisingly unclear under which conditions transformers can or cannot solve it. In this paper, we show that the minimal number of layers a transformer needs to compute PARITY is two. In particular, we solve the open problem asking whether a one-layer transformer can compute PARITY. We answer it negatively by showing that average sensitivity of a one-layer transformer grows slower than that of PARITY. Furthermore, we show a new construction for transformer that computes PARITY, which improves on the existing constructions by removing a number of impractical assumptions. In particular, the existing transformers for PARITY rely on such impractical assumptions as length-dependent positional encoding, hardmax, layernorm without a regularisation parameter, or incompatibility with causal masking. We show that these assumptions can be removed, at the cost of increasing the number of layers from two to four. Specifically, we show that PARITY can be computed by a four-layer transformer using softmax attention, length-independent and polynomially bounded positional encoding, no layernorm, and compatible with both causal and non-causal masking.
Sources
- Masked Hard-Attention Transformers Recognize Exactly the Star-Free Languages
- Theoretical limitations of multi-layer Transformer
- Why are Sensitive Functions Hard for Transformers?
- A completely uniform transformer for parity
- Strassen Attention, Split VC Dimension and Compositionality in Transformers
- The Expressive Power of Transformers with Chain of Thought
- Simulating Hard Attention Using Soft Attention
- The Transformer Cookbook
Related papers
- Polynomial-Augmented Neural Networks (PANNs) with Weak Orthogonality Constraints for Enhanced Function and PDE Approximation
- AIRL-S: Unifying Reinforcement Learning and Search-Based Test-Time Scaling via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- Transformers as Bayesian In-Context Experimenters: Smoothness-Adaptive Efficient ATE Estimation
- Convergence issues in Relational Concept Analysis based on AOC-posets
- Beliefs Beyond Posteriors: Local-Consistency Optimisation for Bayesian Neural Networks
- Understanding Diffusion Models via Ratio-Based Function Approximation with SignReLU Networks