Donors and Recipients: On Asymmetric Transfer Across Tasks and Languages with Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning

arXiv:2511.13368 · cs.CL, cs.AI · Submitted 2025-11-17 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL, cs.AI

Submitted: 2025-11-17

Updated: 2026-09-11

Code: https://github.com/huggingface/peft

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Large language models (LLMs) perform strongly across tasks and languages, yet how improvements in one task or language affect other tasks and languages remains poorly understood.

Terminology

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) perform strongly across tasks and languages, yet how improvements in one task or language affect other tasks and languages remains poorly understood. We conduct a controlled LoRA fine-tuning study across multiple open-weight LLM families and scales, using a standardised grid of 11 languages and four benchmarks. We fine-tune each model on a single task-language source, then evaluate it on all other task-language target pairs to measure transfer. We decompose transfer into three regimes: (i) Matched-Task (Cross-Language), (ii) Cross-Task (Matched-Language), and (iii) Cross-Task (Cross-Language). Single-source fine-tuning yields a net positive uplift across regimes, but the gains are strongly asymmetric. Matched-Task (Cross-Language) transfer emerges as the most effective and structurally regular regime, with transfer magnitude driven principally by the identity of the target language rather than model architecture. We identify a stable coarse-grained hierarchy in which some task and language targets consistently absorb gains from diverse sources, while others remain relatively isolated. These results imply that effective fine-tuning requires accounting for donor-recipient roles to maximise downstream gains while limiting collateral degradation in other capabilities.

Sources

Related papers