Temporal horizons in forecasting: a performance-learnability trade-off

arXiv:2506.03889 · cs.LG, nlin.CD · Submitted 2025-06-04 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, nlin.CD

Submitted: 2025-06-04

Updated: 2026-09-09

Comments: 38 pages, 12 figures Permanent link with reviews: https://openreview.net/forum?id=BeudQIxT1R

Journal ref: Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR), October 2025

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: When training autoregressive models to forecast dynamical systems, a critical question arises: how far into the future should the model be trained to predict for optimal performance? In this work, we

Terminology

Abstract

When training autoregressive models to forecast dynamical systems, a critical question arises: how far into the future should the model be trained to predict for optimal performance? In this work, we address this question by analyzing the relationship between the geometry of the loss landscape and the training time horizon. Using dynamical systems theory, we prove that loss minima for long horizons generalize well to short-term forecasts, whereas minima found on short horizons result in worse long-term predictions. However, we also prove that the loss landscape becomes rougher as the training horizon grows, making long-horizon training inherently challenging. We validate our theory through numerical experiments and discuss practical implications for selecting training horizons. Our results provide a principled foundation for hyperparameter optimization in autoregressive forecasting models.

Sources

Related papers