Influence of finite-temperature effects on CMB power spectrum
astro-ph.CO, gr-qc, hep-th
Submitted: 2025-03-10
Updated: 2026-09-16
Comments: 45 (42+3) pages, 8 figures 7 tables, expanded, improved clarification, references added, version to appear in NPB
Code: https://github.com/iparkPSU/modified_CLASS_3
Project page: http://class-code.net
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We explore the implications of finite-temperature quantum field theory effects on cosmological parameters within the framework of the Ł CDM model and its modification.
Terminology
Abstract
We explore the implications of finite-temperature quantum field theory effects on cosmological parameters within the framework of the Ł CDM model and its modification. By incorporating temperature-dependent corrections to the cosmological constant, we extend the standard cosmological model to include additional density parameters, Ω Ł 2 and Ω Ł 3, which arise from finite-T quantum gravitational effects. Using the Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS), we analyze the impact of these corrections on the cosmic microwave background power spectrum and compare the results with the Planck 2018 data. Through brute-force parameter scans and advanced machine learning techniques, including quartic regression, we demonstrate that the inclusion of Ω Ł 2 and Ω Ł 3 improves the model's fit to the fine structure of the reference power spectrum. Because Ω Ł 2 and Ω Ł 3 originate from finite-temperature quantum (loop) corrections rather than being introduced as free dark-energy components, they are expected to be small a priori; their smallness is thus a prediction of the framework, not a sign that they are negligible. The improvement of the fit is measured by the coefficient of determination R squared (the fraction of variance in the parameter--distance relation captured by the regression), together with lower mean squared error and lower AIC/BIC scores than those of the Ł CDM model. Despite identified methodological limitations, these findings establish an exploratory framework for incorporating finite-temperature quantum corrections into precision cosmology and open new avenues for data-driven exploration of cosmological parameters.
Sources
- Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
- Basics of thermal field theory -- a tutorial on perturbative computations
- Cosmological constant as a finite temperature effect
- Quantization of gravity and finite temperature effects
- Finite-temperature renormalization of Standard Model coupled with gravity, and its implications for cosmology
- Matter Non-conservation in the Universe and Dynamical Dark Energy
- Hypersurface foliation approach to renormalization of ADM formulation of gravity
- Lagrangian constraints and renormalization of 4D gravity
- One-loop renormalization of a gravity-scalar system
- Revisit of renormalization of Einstein-Maxwell theory at one-loop
- Foliation, jet bundle and quantization of Einstein gravity
- A Note On Boundary Conditions In Euclidean Gravity
- Holographic quantization of gravity in a black hole background
- A Note On The Canonical Formalism for Gravity
- Cosmological constant and vacuum energy: old and new ideas
- The Cosmological Constant Problem and Running Vacuum in the Expanding Universe
- Running vacuum in QFT in FLRW spacetime: The dynamics of $\rho_{\rm vac}(H)$ from the quantized matter fields
- The emergence of cosmic repulsion
- Observable vacuum energy is finite in expanding space
- Non-renormalizable theories and finite formulation of QFT
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation