RL-STaR: Theoretical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning Frameworks for Self-Taught Reasoner

arXiv:2410.23912 · cs.AI, cs.LG · Submitted 2024-10-31 · Read on arXiv

cs.AI, cs.LG

Submitted: 2024-10-31

Updated: 2026-09-20

Journal ref: ICLR 2025 Workshop on Reasoning and Planning for Large Language Models

Code: https://github.com/d09942015ntu/rl_star

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: The reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) have improved with chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting, allowing models to solve complex tasks stepwise.

Terminology

Abstract

The reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) have improved with chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting, allowing models to solve complex tasks stepwise. However, training CoT capabilities requires detailed reasoning data, which is often scarce. The self-taught reasoner (STaR) framework addresses this by using reinforcement learning to automatically generate reasoning steps, reducing reliance on human-labeled data. Although STaR and its variants have demonstrated empirical success, a theoretical foundation explaining these improvements is lacking. This work provides a theoretical framework for understanding the effectiveness of reinforcement learning on CoT reasoning and STaR. Our contributions are: (1) criteria for the quality of pre-trained models necessary to initiate effective reasoning improvement; (2) an analysis of policy improvement, showing why LLM reasoning improves iteratively with STaR; (3) conditions for convergence to an optimal reasoning policy; and (4) an examination of STaR's robustness, explaining how it can improve reasoning even when incorporating occasional incorrect steps. We also run RL-STaR on GPT-2, Qwen2.5-0.5B and Phi-3-mini, and the measured return curves follow the ones the analysis predicts. This framework bridges empirical findings with theoretical insights, advancing reinforcement learning approaches for reasoning in LLMs.

Sources

Related papers