A General Formulation for Path Constrained Time-Optimized Trajectory Planning with Environmental and Object Contacts

arXiv:2410.06295 · cs.RO · Submitted 2024-10-08 · Read on arXiv

Listen

Radio episode about this paper

Transcript

Introduction to the show: ident: Robotics Radio. Generated commentary on the latest robotics and control papers.

Rosa: Today's paper: "A General Formulation for Path Constrained Time-Optimized Trajectory Planning with Environmental and Object Contacts".

Dev: A typical manipulation task involves computing joint torques and grasping forces for time-optimal motion while ensuring that grasp stability and all physical constraints, including dynamics, environment contact,

Rosa: First, who's behind it and why it matters.

Paper summary: Taro: Thinking about the authors and the title "A General Formulation for Path Constrained Time-Optimized Trajectory Planning with Environmental and Object Contacts," what do you see as the biggest practical implication of this work?

Rosa: The main implication is that we have a more mathematically rigorous framework for planning movements when you have multiple physical interactions happening simultaneously, which is something we need to do if we want robots to operate reliably in diverse, unstructured environments.

Dev: I think the title points to the fact that it offers generality; it's not just solving one specific manipulation problem but providing a general method that can be adapted for many different contact scenarios.

Taro: If this formulation is used widely, I imagine it could lead to more sophisticated autonomous systems where manipulators can interact with fragile objects or complex environments without needing extremely high-fidelity, real-time physics models for every single interaction.

Rosa: That's right; it allows us to focus our efforts on improving the fidelity of the friction cone constraints themselves rather than reinventing the core time-optimal planning structure from scratch every time we face a new setup.

Dev: From an engineering standpoint, this approach provides a solid foundation for developing online trajectory generation systems that can handle dynamic object interaction while respecting physical limits, which is critical for practical deployment.

Taro: Ultimately, this work gives us a tool to explore the space of possible optimal motions much more systematically than we could before, especially concerning those nuanced environmental contact forces.

Conclusion: Rosa: So, we've looked at how this paper tackles time-optimal trajectory planning by incorporating those friction constraints for both the hand and the object contacts, now let's wrap up what this whole thing means for us.

Dev: I think it boils down to giving us a unified mathematical way to handle all those complex physical interactions in a single optimization problem without having to write separate, messy code for every scenario.

Taro: Exactly, the authors are showing how they’ve built a framework that can manage the dynamics of the robot and its environment simultaneously using these SOC constraints. It's about making sure we don't just plan a path in empty space but a physically feasible one where everything—the robot, the object, and what it touches—moves correctly together.

Rosa: That makes sense from a field perspective; I wonder if this formulation is robust enough to handle the kinds of unexpected slips or soft impacts we see when operating outside a controlled lab setting for extended periods.

Dev: It's a crucial question for me; if we deploy this on a real robot, I need to know how quickly the solver can converge and what kind of latency we’re looking at when it has to re-plan mid-motion because something went wrong.

Taro: That brings up the point about system robustness; what happens when the environment misbehaves in an unforeseen way that violates those friction models? The paper lays out how you could potentially adapt the constraints to handle those deviations, which is important for autonomy.

Rosa: It sounds like this work gives us a solid theoretical foundation for designing safer, more adaptable robotic systems that can handle real-world complexity over longer durations.

Dev: From my side, it’s about creating a more predictable control loop where the constraints are clearly defined mathematical boundaries rather than just heuristics we have to guess at.

Taro: So the big picture here is moving from specific case studies to a general planning methodology that can be applied across different manipulation tasks with varying contact geometries.

Rosa: It seems like this paper provides a much more rigorous way for us to think about how robots should move through complex physical spaces, setting a new standard for trajectory generation.

Dev: And that rigor is what we need if we want these systems to operate reliably in demanding industrial or service settings where things get messy.

Taro: So the next big question is how this general formulation can be practically implemented and tested against those real-world scenarios we've been discussing.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stony Brook University, USA · Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI), Technical University of Munich

cs.RO

Submitted: 2024-10-08

Updated: 2024-10-08

Journal ref: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2024

DOI: 10.1109/IROS58592.2024.10801794

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Importance score: 78/100

The gist: A typical manipulation task involves computing joint torques and grasping forces for time-optimal motion while ensuring that grasp stability and all physical constraints, including dynamics,

Key concepts

Second-Order Cone Program (SOCP)
A type of convex optimization problem that uses second-order cone constraints to model complex physical limitations, such as friction cones. It allows the planner to efficiently find a feasible trajectory that minimizes total time while respecting dynamic and contact constraints.
Friction Cone Constraints
These mathematical constraints define the limits on how much force can be applied at a contact point before slippage occurs. The paper uses specific approximations (PCWF and SFCE) to model these nonlinear friction behaviors accurately for both robot-object and object-environment interactions.
Time-Optimal Control Formulation
The goal is to minimize the total time $T$ taken to complete a task while satisfying all physical laws. This involves minimizing $T$ subject to the robot's equations of motion, object dynamics, and contact force limits, ensuring the fastest possible movement.
Contact Constraints (PCWF/SFCE)
These are specific mathematical models used to describe how forces interact at contacts. PCWF handles point contacts with friction on the environment, while SFCE uses an elliptic approximation for soft finger contacts with the object, providing a way to enforce grasp stability.

Terminology

Summary

A typical manipulation task involves computing joint torques and grasping forces for time-optimal motion while ensuring that grasp stability and all physical constraints, including dynamics, environment contact, and no-slip requirements, are satisfied. This work presents a novel second-order cone program (SOCP) formulation to bridge the gap between geometric motion planning and time-optimal trajectory planning by incorporating nonlinear friction cone constraints at both hand-object and object-environment contacts.

The gist

We present a novel second-order cone program (SOCP) formulation of the time-optimal trajectory planning problem that considers nonlinear friction cone constraints at the hand-object and object-environment contacts along with the constraints imposed by the robot dynamics and the robots’ actuator limits.

System Modeling and Constraints

The paper models a system consisting of a robot manipulator manipulating an object, considering multiple environment-object contacts. The dynamics are expressed through equations relating joint torques to contact wrenches:

  1. Manipulator Dynamics: The equations of motion for the robot manipulator in contact with the environment are given by:

τ − JT(q)he = M(q)q¨ + C(q, q˙)q˙ + g(q)

  1. Overall System Relationship: The relationship between joint torques and all manipulator-object contact wrenches is compactly represented as:

τ + JM(q)FM = MM(q)q¨ + C(q, q˙)q˙ + G(q).

  1. Object Dynamics: The object motion is governed by the equation relating external wrenches to net wrench:

Xui=1 GEifEi + Xvj=1 GMj fMj + Ofext = Ofnet.

Contact Constraints

The paper explicitly models the two types of contact constraints using Second-Order Cone (SOC) constraints:

  1. Point Contact with Friction (PCWF): For object-environment contacts, the contact wrench satisfies the friction cone constraint:

µEi s fEi,x eEi,x 2 + fEi,y eEi,y 2 ≤ fEi,z

  1. Soft Finger Contact with Elliptic Approximation (SFCE): For manipulator-object contacts, the contact wrench satisfies the elliptic constraint:

µMⱼ s fMⱼ,x eMⱼ,x 2 + fMⱼ,y eMⱼ,y 2 + τMj z eMj,z 2 ≤ fMⱼ z

These constraints are defined by defining friction cones KEi and KMj as:

KEi = (rT / µEi s r2 / eEi,x + r2 / eEi,y ≤ r3, r4,r5,r6 = 0)

KMⱼ = (rT / µMⱼ s r2 / eMⱼ,x + r2 / eMⱼ,y + r26 eMj,z ≤ fMⱼ z

Additionally, an upper bound on the normal contact forces is imposed:

Fz = [fM1,z, fM2,z,..., fMv,z]T ≤ Fz1

Time-Optimal Control Formulation

The problem is formulated as a time-optimal control problem that seeks to minimize the total time T:

minimize T (32) subject to (for t ∈ [0, T]), τ (s) + JM(s)FM(s) = MM(s)¨s + CM(s) ˙s2 + GM(s)

The trajectory is parameterized by a scalar path coordinate s, where the time dependence is captured by the scaling function s:

such that s: [0, T] 7→ [0, 1] with s(0) = 0 and s(T) = 1.

Reformulation as a Convex Optimization Problem

To solve this complex problem efficiently, the formulation is reformulated using new optimization variables a(s) and b(s), where a(s) represents the object acceleration and b(s) represents the time scaling squared:

  1. New Variables: a(s) = ¨s, b(s) = ˙ss2

  2. Constraint Linking Variables: b'(s) = 2a(s)

This transformation results in a convex optimization problem where the objective function is minimized over the path parameter s in [0, 1], subject to linear constraints and SOC constraints (KEi and KMj).

Implementation and Solution Approach

The solution strategy employs a direct transcription method using collocation points. The continuous functions are approximated by piecewise polynomial segments, leading to a discrete Second-Order Cone Program (SOCP):

Improvements for AI systems

As a fastidious and diligent researcher, I have analyzed this paper, A General Formulation for Path Constrained Time-Optimized Trajectory Planning with Environmental and Object Contacts. The core contribution is transforming a complex robotic manipulation problem into a tractable Second-Order Cone Program (SOCP) formulation.

Here are the specific improvements that can be made to AI systems using this framework, and what those improved systems can achieve:

The primary improvement lies in moving from standard, collision-free path planning or simple minimum-time control to a system capable of executing complex, constrained manipulation tasks in real-time with guaranteed physical feasibility.

Here are the specific improvements and capabilities:

  1. Predictive Time Parameterization for Contact-Constrained Motion:

  2. Real-Time Grasp Force and Torque Synthesis:

  3. Robust Handling of Complex Multi-Contact Scenarios (Prehensile/Non-Prehensile):

  4. Guaranteed Feasibility in Dynamic Environments:

Specifically, the improved AI system can perform the following actions:

  1. An AI system can compute the optimal time parameterization, joint torques, and necessary contact forces for a robot to move an object along a pre-defined geometric path while simultaneously maintaining continuous physical contact with both its environment (e.g., a table) and an object (e.g., a box).

  2. This system can execute highly dynamic tasks such as:

  3. Pivoting heavy objects while reacting to environmental reaction forces to aid the lift, or:

  4. Precisely picking up objects from flat surfaces by calculating the exact required contact forces needed at each moment to prevent slippage (using the nonlinear friction cone constraints).

  5. The system can handle complex General Waiter Motion Problems, which involve moving an object on a tray, where it must manage multiple contacts (gripper-tray and tray-object) simultaneously while optimizing for minimum execution time.

  6. The resulting AI controller is inherently robust because the entire optimization problem is formulated as a convex SOCP, guaranteeing that any local optimum found by the solver will be the globally optimal solution for time minimization under all defined physical constraints (dynamics, actuator limits, and contact friction).

  7. The system can dynamically adjust its motion in response to changing conditions (e.g., varying object mass or friction coefficients) by simply re-solving the SOCP formulation with updated parameters, leading to adaptive manipulation strategies.

Abstract

A typical manipulation task consists of a manipulator equipped with a gripper to grasp and move an object with constraints on the motion of the hand-held object, which may be due to the nature of the task itself or from object-environment contacts. In this paper, we study the problem of computing joint torques and grasping forces for time-optimal motion of an object, while ensuring that the grasp is not lost and any constraints on the motion of the object, either due to dynamics, environment contact, or no-slip requirements, are also satisfied. We present a second-order cone program (SOCP) formulation of the time-optimal trajectory planning problem that considers nonlinear friction cone constraints at the hand-object and object-environment contacts. Since SOCPs are convex optimization problems that can be solved optimally in polynomial time using interior point methods, we can solve the trajectory optimization problem efficiently. We present simulation results on three examples, including a non-prehensile manipulation task, which shows the generality and effectiveness of our approach.

Related papers