Recommendations on test datasets for evaluating AI solutions in pathology
eess.IV, cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.LG, physics.med-ph
Submitted: 2022-04-21
Updated: 2022-04-21
Journal ref: Modern Pathology 35(12), 2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01147-y
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that automatically extract information from digital histology images have shown great promise for improving pathological diagnosis.
Terminology
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that automatically extract information from digital histology images have shown great promise for improving pathological diagnosis. Prior to routine use, it is important to evaluate their predictive performance and obtain regulatory approval. This assessment requires appropriate test datasets. However, compiling such datasets is challenging and specific recommendations are missing. A committee of various stakeholders, including commercial AI developers, pathologists, and researchers, discussed key aspects and conducted extensive literature reviews on test datasets in pathology. Here, we summarize the results and derive general recommendations for the collection of test datasets. We address several questions: Which and how many images are needed? How to deal with low-prevalence subsets? How can potential bias be detected? How should datasets be reported? What are the regulatory requirements in different countries? The recommendations are intended to help AI developers demonstrate the utility of their products and to help regulatory agencies and end users verify reported performance measures. Further research is needed to formulate criteria for sufficiently representative test datasets so that AI solutions can operate with less user intervention and better support diagnostic workflows in the future.
Sources
- FRODO: Free rejection of out-of-distribution samples: application to chest x-ray analysis
- A Benchmark of Medical Out of Distribution Detection
- Confidence-based Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Comparative Study and Analysis
- Negative Data Augmentation
- PathologyGAN: Learning deep representations of cancer tissue
- PanNuke Dataset Extension, Insights and Baselines
- Lizard: A Large-Scale Dataset for Colonic Nuclear Instance Segmentation and Classification
- Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkit
- AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Bias
Related papers
- Revisiting Integration of Image and Metadata for DICOM Series Classification: Cross-Attention and Dictionary Learning
- VesselSDF: Distance Field Priors for Vascular Network Reconstruction
- cSVR: Convolutional Slice-to-Volume Reconstruction
- NAIMA: Semantics Aware RGB Guided Depth Super-Resolution
- AneumoBench: A Source-Linked Benchmark for Synthetic-Geometry Transfer in Aneurysm CFD
- RETO: A Rotary-Enhanced Transformer Operator for High-Fidelity Prediction of Automotive Aerodynamics